Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 U.S. 608 - Iron Mountain Co v. Johnson

Iron Mountain Co v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

119 U.S. 608 · 1887

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2011 · most notably Pernell v. Southall Realty (1974), St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad (1892)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 37 state decisions — followed in 17 states

11018871890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where any person is in the peaceable and quiet possession, he shall not be turned out by the strong hand, by force, by violence, or by terror. The party so using force and acquiring possession may have the superior title, or may have the better right to the present possession, but the policy of 'the law in this class of eases is to prevent disturbances of the public peace; ,;to forbid any person righting himself, in a case of that kind, by his own ’hand, and by .violence; and to require that the party who has in this manner ' obtained possession shall restore it to the party from .whom it has been so obtáined; and then, when the parties.are in statu quo, or in the same position as they were before the use of violence, the party oat of possession must resort to legal means to obtain his possession, as he should have done In the first Instance.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.