Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 U.S. 625 - Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.

Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.’s Empirical Analysis

119 U.S. 625 · 1887

Citation profile

300
cited by 300 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

115 federal appellate · 50 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 300 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020 · most notably The Robert W. Parsons (1903), Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co. (2005)

115 federal appellate · 50 district · 17 state decisions

430188718901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 300 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he fact that it floats on the water does not make it a ship or vessel,”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “used in a very broad sense, to include all navigable structures intended for transportation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““If we search, through all the books, from the Rules of Oleron, to the present time, we shall find that salvage is only spoken of in relation to ships and vessels and their cargoes, * * * which have been committed to, or lost in, the sea or its branches, or other public navigable waters, and have been found and rescued.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.