Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Utah 434 - LYON v. Bateman

LYON v. Bateman’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Jenkins v. Swan (1983), Miller v. Weaver (2003)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

6019511960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Massachusetts v. Mellon · Fergus v. Russel · Asplund v. Hannett · Burke v. Snively · Stevens v. St. Mary's Training School

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) there must be a justiciable controversy; (2) the interests of the parties must be adverse; (3) the parties seeking relief must have a legally protectible interest in the controversy; and (4) the issues between the parties must be ripe for judicial determination.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We have repeatedly held that taxpayers may resort to a court of equity to prevent the misapplication of public funds, and that this right is based upon the taxpayers' equitable ownership of such funds and their liability to replenish the public treasury for the deficiency which would be caused by the misappropriation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] taxpayer should be permitted to enjoin the unlawful expenditure of tax moneys in which he has a pecuniary interest, or to prevent increased levies for illegal purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.