Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Wash. 2d 204 - State v. Speaks

119 Wash. 2d 204 - State v. Speaks’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
6
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

87 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Isla Verde Intern. Holdings v. CAMAS (2002), 140 N.C. App. 198 - State v. Jarman (2000)

87 state decisions

3901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brewster v. Derwinski · Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations Authority · Frates v. Weinshienk · Stapf v. United States · 116 Wash. 2d 794 - Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Home detention" means a program of partial confinement available to offenders wherein the offender is confined in a private residence subject to electronic surveillance.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “all confinement time served before the sentencing”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “confinement ... if home detention or work crew has been ordered by the court, in an approved residence, for a substantial portion of each day with the balance of the day spent in the community. Partial confinement includes work release, home detention, work crew, and a combination of work crew and home detention as defined in this section.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.