Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Wash. 2d 294 - State v. Ortiz

119 Wash. 2d 294 - State v. Ortiz’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

157
cited by 157 later decisions
4
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

157 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 157 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably 122 Wash. 2d 1 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Young (1993), 125 Wash. 2d 570 - State v. Gentry (1995)

157 state decisions

7401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Arizona v. Youngblood · Frye v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “unless a criminal defendant can show bad faith on the part of the police, failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not constitute a denial of due process of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`the mental process of thinking beforehand, deliberation, reflection, weighing or reasoning for a period of time, however, short.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.