119 Wash. 2d 385 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably State v. Hennings (1996), State v. Gonzalez (2010)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott · 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · Dunham v. City and Borough of Juneau · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Restitution ordered by a court pursuant to a criminal conviction shall be based on easily ascertainable damages for injury to or loss of property'”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“When restitution is ordered, the court shall determine the amount of restitution due at the sentencing hearing or within sixty days”. The Washington State Supreme Court recently held that the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We will not give the statutes an overly technical construction which would permit the defendant to escape from just punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.