119 Wash. 2d 390 - State v. Chadderton’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably State v. Wakefield (1996), 75 Wash. App. 500 - State v. Roche (1994)
56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · 108 Wash. 2d 419 - State v. Fisher · 117 Wash. 2d 211 - State v. Grewe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“disregard[ing] a substantial risk that a wrongful act may occur ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“brutally hurled her ... from a distance of several feet.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“factors inherent in the crimeinherent in the sense that they were necessarily considered by the Legislature [in establishing the standard sentence range for the offense] and do not distinguish the defendant's behavior from that inherent in all crimes of that typemay not be relied upon to justify an exceptional sentence.... [90]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ferguson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.