119 Wash. 2d 401 - State v. Strauss’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 134 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 137 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably State v. Thomas (2004), State v. Thomas (2004)
3 federal appellate · 134 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Ohio v. Roberts · Williams v. People of State of New York · Idaho v. Wright · Townsend v. Burke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 137 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“key determination is `whether the statement was made while the declarant was still under the influence of the event to the extent that [the] statement could not be the result of fabrication, intervening actions, or the exercise of choice or judgment.'”
12 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owens · State v. Ohlson“relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ohlson · State v. Williams“The court will not assume that the Legislature would attempt to effect a significant change in the law by mere implication.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.