119 Wash. 2d 452 - In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 166 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 173 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably 128 Wash. 2d 537 - Whatcom County v. City of Bellingham (1996), 135 Wash. 2d 326 - State v. Riles (1998)
2 federal appellate · 166 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 96 Wash. 2d 552 - Overton v. Economic Assistance Authority · 116 Wash. 2d 1 - American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla Walla · 102 Wash. 2d 170 - Miebach v. Colasurdo · 117 Wash. 2d 772 - John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood Center · 114 Wash. 2d 572 - Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 173 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An amendment is curative only if it clarifies or technically corrects an ambiguous statute.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he comments of a single legislator are generally considered inadequate to establish legislative intent.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“become `a title, legal or equitable, to the present or future enjoyment of property.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.