119 Wash. 2d 563 - State v. Zakel’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably 123 Wash. 2d 138 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Cashaw (1994), 123 Wash. 2d 15 - Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical Center (1993)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · United States v. Salvucci · Brown v. United States · 95 Wash. 2d 170 - State v. Simpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“repeatedly stated that we will not decide a constitutional issue unless it is absolutely necessary for the determination of a case”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Weiss v. Glemp · State v. Evans“automatic standing” exception to the general rules stated above. A defendant has automatic standing to challenge a search or seizure if (1) the offense charged involves possession as an”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because the Defendant’s challenge focuses primarily on the state constitution and the crime involved is a possessory offense, we must briefly address the "automatic standing” exception to the general rules stated above. A defendant has automatic standing to challenge a search or seizure if (1) the offense charged involves possession as an "essential” element of the offense; and (2) the defendant was in possession of the contraband at the time of the contested search or seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.