119 Wash. App. 367 - State v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Class C prior felony convictions other than sex offenses shall not be included in the offender score if, since the last date of release from confinement (including full-time residential treatment) pursuant to a felony conviction, if any, or entry of judgment and sentence, the offender had spent five consecutive years in the community without committing any crime that subsequently results in a conviction.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Huff

2. “issue and to request an exceptional sentence downward. He raises additional issues in his Statement of Additional Grounds for Review, including illegal seizure and insufficient evidence. We hold that because the judgment and sentence does not show on its face that the Illinois conviction”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Huff

3. “the officers appeared to deliberately stack the offenses to boost the offender score”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Huff