Roberson v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 131 Wash. 2d 640 - Sintra, Inc. v. City of Seattle · 111 Wash. 2d 256 - Folsom v. County of Spokane · Mw v. Dshs · 90 Wash. 2d 395 - Gross v. City of Lynnwood · Womsley v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“or a constitutional requirement; rather, it is a discretionary policy that reflects the courts' practice of not reopening matters already decided. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberson v. Perez“rule of practice [that] promotes the finality and efficiency of the judicial process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberson v. Perez“This rule of practice promotes the finality and efficiency of the judicial process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberson v. Perez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.