Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Wis. 2d 407 - Ferraro v. Koelsch

119 Wis. 2d 407 - Ferraro v. Koelsch’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2008 · most notably 124 Wis. 2d 154 - Ferraro v. Koelsch (1985), Panto v. Moore Business Forms, Inc. (1988)

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

120198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield · 116 Cal. App. 3d 311 - Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc. · 113 Wis. 2d 561 - Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet · Johnson v. National Beef Packing Co. · Jeroyd W. Greene v. Howard University, a Corporation, Nathan Hare v. Howard University, a Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs assertion that the Superior Court erred in finding that defendant’s Booklet did not alter the “at will” status of her employment is, likewise, without merit. This issue is one of first impression in this Court. Other jurisdictions, however, have resolved the question against the employee at will where the booklet has been deemed to be merely a unilateral statement of company policies and where it does not set out a definite term of employment for company employees____ The Booklet in question here was issued by defendant after plaintiff began her employment. It was a unilateral expression of the defendant’s policies and procedures on a number of topics, issued for the guidance and benefit of employees. The Booklet does not grant to any employee a specific term of employment and does not, therefore, alter plaintiff’s “at will” employment status. No error was committed by the Superior Court in awarding summary judgment for defendant, (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is evidence in conflict with the uniform course of nature or with fully established or conceded facts. Ferraro v. Koelsch, 119 Wis. 2d 407, 411 , 350 N.W.2d 735, 737 (Ct. App. 1984). 7 The legislature has since replaced the word”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““6. Disrespectful conduct. . . fighting on hotel premises; coercion, intimidations or threats of any kind against guests . . . using vulgarity . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.