119 Wis. 2d 451 - State v. Ehlen’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 119 Wis. 2d 483 - State v. Walstad · 69 Wis. 2d 554 - State v. Amundson · 119 Wis. 2d 461 - State v. Disch · 98 Wis. 2d 20 - State v. Booth · Marriage of Hunt v. Hunt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The importance of the production of the original breath ampoule or a portion of the blood sample as the sine qua non of due process is a myth that should not be perpetuated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the retention of a breath ampoule or of a blood sample [is] of miniscule importance in the assurance of a fair trial when weighed in the balance against the traditional rights of defendants in criminal or quasi-criminal proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he right to cross-examine witnesses and experts for the state, the right to impeach by use of the separate blood or breath analysis results, and the right to attack the credibility of the state's witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.