Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Wis. 2d 65 - Driver v. Driver

119 Wis. 2d 65 - Driver v. Driver’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2016

14 state decisions

801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 97 Wis. 2d 332 - Grams v. Boss · 45 Wis. 2d 235 - Grognet v. Fox Valley Trucking Service · 21 Wis. 2d 482 - State Ex Rel. Siciliano v. Johnson · 89 Wis. 2d 156 - O'Leary v. Board of Directors, Howard Young Medical Center, Inc. · 114 Wis. 2d 54 - Heinz Plastic Mold Co. v. Continental Tool Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court must initially examine the pleadings to determine whether a claim has been stated and whether a material issue of fact is presented. If the complaint states a claim and the pleadings show the existence of factual issues, the court examines the moving party's . . . affidavits or other proof to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment under sec. 802.08(2). To make a prima facie case for summary judgment, a moving defendant must show a defense which would defeat the plaintiff. If the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment, the court must examine the affidavits and other proof of the opposing party ... to determine whether there exist disputed material facts, or undisputed material facts from which reasonable alternative inferences may be drawn, sufficient to entitle the opposing party to a trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he principles which govern the construction of contracts also govern the construction and interpretation of corporate bylaws ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.