Scott v. Rosenwitz

¶1In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 29, 1959, denying their motion to open their default and to vacate the dismissal of their complaint. The complaint had been dismissed pursuant to rule 302 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., not voting.