Marshall v. Arias’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 2005
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appellants, as movants for summaiy judgment, bore the burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (citing Fitzpatrick v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 285 A.D.2d 487 , 728 N.Y.S.2d 484 (2d Dept.2001))); Fitzpatrick v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 285 A.D.2d 487 , 728 N.Y.S.2d 484, 485 (2d Dept.2001) (noting that the Ibarra dictum should not be followed). 14 . Although the doctors do not state their reasons for using the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.