Murphey v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. Otterson (1914), Webb v. Crane Co. (1938)
2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jaquith v. Rowley · Bless v. Jenkins · Loeb v. . Willis · Rutenberg v. Main · Fowler v. Rapley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a lien enforceable at law fias attached to property, the purchaser takes the property subject to tho lien, irrespective of notice, except where notice, real or constructive, is made essential by registration laws or the statute whereunder the lien arises.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Madden v. La Cofske““ . . . The conclusion seems inevitable that the lien attaches for the entire [period] of the lease on all property of the tenant, placed upon or used on the leased premises, and subsists until all rent for the' term has been paid. ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dewar v. Hagans“In adopting the quoted paragraphs from the statutes of Texas in 1887, we took them already so interpreted”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hoover v. Wukasch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.