Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 ARKAPP 181 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on Burks v. United States · Greene v. Massey · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Bryan v. United States · 76 Ill. 2d 289 - People v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “["Trial error does not constitute a decision to the effect that the government has failed to prove its case and implies nothing with respect to guilt or innocence of the defendant.”] Rather it is a determination that á defendant has been convicted through a judicial process which is defective in some fundamental respect, e.g. incorrect receipt or rejection of evidence, incorrect instructions or prosecutorial misconduct. When this occurs, the accused has a strong interest in obtaining a fair readjudication of his guilt free from error, just as society maintains a valid concern for insuring that the guilty are punished. Burks at 15 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.