Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 B.R. 693

In re Perry

U.S. Bankruptcy Court

Decided July 8, 1981

U.S. Bankruptcy Court · decided 1981-07-08

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325

Relies on In Re Charnock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-07-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2004

1 federal appellate ·

40198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION

HAL J. BONNEY, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

¶2Jean Whitfield Perry, the debtor herein, has filed a Chapter 13 petition with a plan that would pay her unsecured creditors twenty-five percent [25%] of their debts.

¶3The matter is before the Court, following a hearing, on the confirmation of the plan.

¶4The test for confirming a Chapter 13 plan is set forth at 11 U.S.C. § 1325.

¶5The Court denies confirmation for the following reasons.

¶6(1) Under the plan $1,741.84 would go to unsecured creditors, yet $4,650.00 would go toward her automobile and $16,694.64 toward her home. Such payments are not substantial and meaningful. In re Charnock, 12 B.R. 691 (Bkrtcy.). This is an element of good faith. 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3).

¶7(2) In addition to the automobile referred to above, a Pontiac Sunbird, the debtor’s schedules reflect she owns a 1978 Cadillac SeVille valued at $6,000.00 and no lien appears thereon. Therefore, under the Chapter 13 plan the creditors would receive less than under a Chapter 7 liquidation and this violates 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(4).

¶8Confirmation is denied.

¶9IT IS SO ORDERED.

/12/br/693 · .json · Public domain