Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Cal. 3d 229 - In Re Russell

12 Cal. 3d 229 - In Re Russell’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
9
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently January 2003 · most notably 19 Cal. 3d 165 - Levy v. Cohen (1977), 20 Cal. 3d 765 - State of South Dakota v. Brown (1978)

5 federal appellate · 80 state decisions

4601974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association · Arthur Appleyard v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · South Carolina v. Bailey · 9 Cal. 3d 662 - People v. Uhlemann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of res judicata has a double aspect: (1) it `precludes parties or their privies from relitigating a cause of action that has been finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.' (2) `Any issue necessarily decided in such litigation is conclusively determined as to the parties or their privies if it is involved in a subsequent lawsuit on a different cause of action.' [Citations.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.