12 Cal. 3d 486 - People v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 247 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 258 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably 26 Cal. 3d 557 - People v. Johnson (1980), 27 Cal. 3d 1 - People v. Green (1980)
8 federal appellate · 247 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · 3 Cal. 3d 595 - People v. West · 62 Cal. 2d 692 - People v. Hillery · People v. Redmond · 1 Cal. 3d 379 - People v. Mosher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 258 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test on appeal is whether substantial evidence supports the conclusion of the trier of fact, not whether the evidence proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation omitted.] The appellate court must determine whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the prosecution sustained its burden of proving the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he psychiatrist's opinion that the [patient] suffered from a sexual psychopathology was merely an opinion, not an act, condition or event within the meaning of [Evid. Code, § 1271]. `”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Campos“To justify a criminal conviction, the trier of fact must be reasonably persuaded to a near certainty. The trier must therefore have reasonably rejected all that undermines confidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.