12 Cal. 3d 686 - People v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 294 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 338 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 22 Cal. 3d 865 - Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co. (1978), 51 Cal. 3d 335 - Lucido v. Superior Court (1990)
28 federal appellate · 294 state decisions — followed in 16 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Gilbert v. California · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association · 58 Cal. 2d 601 - Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd. · Board of Education v. Mapp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 338 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) to promote judicial economy by minimizing repetitive litigation; (2) to prevent inconsistent judgments which undermine the integrity of the judicial system; and (3) to provide repose by preventing a person from being harassed by vexatious litigation.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the issue necessarily decided at the previous [proceeding] is identical to the one which is sought to be relitigated; if (2) the previous [proceeding] resulted in a final judgment on the merits; and if (3) the party against whom collateral estoppel is asserted was a party or in privity with a party at the prior proceeding.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“where an accused's guilt must be predicated on his vicarious liability for the acts of a previously acquitted confederate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.