Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Cal. 3d 699 - People v. Canfield

12 Cal. 3d 699 - People v. Canfield’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
6
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably 37 Cal. 3d 591 - Mitchell v. Superior Court (1984), 9 Cal. 4th 1196 - People v. Gionis (1995)

4 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

32019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Simmons v. United States · 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court · United States v. Kahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Subject to Section 912 and except as otherwise provided in this article, the client, whether or not a party, has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a confidential communication between client and lawyer if the privilege is claimed by: “(a) The holder of the privilege; “(b) A person who is authorized to claim the privilege by the holder of the privilege; or “(c) The person who was the lawyer at the time of the confidential communication, but such person may not claim the privilege if there is no holder of the privilege in existence or if he is otherwise instructed by a person authorized to permit disclosure.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.