Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Cal. 3d 96 - In Re Bye

12 Cal. 3d 96 - In Re Bye’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

135
cited by 135 later decisions
6
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 122 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 135 later decisions — most recently April 1996 · most notably 19 Cal. 3d 921 - In Re Roger S. (1977), 15 Cal. 3d 921 - In Re Podesto (1976)

4 federal appellate · 122 state decisions

730197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Gault · Stanley v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Similar to the parolee, the CRC outpatient may lead a relatively normal life while in his conditional status. That status, albeit subject to revocation, `enables him to do a wide range of things open to persons who have never been convicted of any crime.' Although the outpatient may be required to submit to periodic and surprise testing for narcotic use and may also be ordered to maintain close contact with a specially trained parole agent, he retains his civil rights [citations omitted] and is not considered `civilly dead' for certain purposes as is the parolee whose conditional liberty interest has heretofore been deemed protected. Equally important, as in the case of the parolee, the outpatient has relied on the state's promise that his conditional liberty will not be revoked unless he fails to abide by the conditions of his release and he is obligated to control his conduct accordingly. ... . Although the Legislature has denominated the narcotic rehabilitation plan `civil' rather than `penal' the use of one label rather than the other does not alter the applicability of due process protections to the outpatient's conditional liberty interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] revocation decision in a civil addict program is often a medical one and as such is necessarily less subject to objective scrutiny by a lay hearing officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.