12 Cal. 4th 205 - In Re Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Matter of Discipline of Babilis (1997), 25 Cal. 4th 11 - In Re Lesansky (2001)
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203
Relies on United States v. Halper · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch · 8 Cal. 3d 842 - In Re Fahey · 11 Cal. 3d 91 - People v. Belcher · 49 Cal. 3d 804 - Baker v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to protect the public, to promote confidence in the legal system, and to maintain high professional standards”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.