Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 CALAPP2D 631 - Laumann v. Conner

Laumann v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2017

13 state decisions

90193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Diamond v. Superior Court · Phillips v. Powell · Power v. Fairbanks · 128 Cal. App. 662 - Moore v. Specialty Oil Tool Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We must assume in favor of the action of the trial court that the motion for a new trial was based upon some one or more legal grounds upon which a sufficient showing was made to warrant the action of the trial court in regard thereto. The record before us does not show the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.