Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 CALAPP4TH 1139 - People v. Woods

People v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2015

18 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · 52 Cal. 3d 1142 - Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV · 63 Cal. 2d 822 - Kellett v. Superior Court · 44 Cal. 3d 474 - Shamblin v. Brattain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Where an offense is a violent felony, as defined in Section 667.5[,] and the prosecution has had two prior dismissals, as defined in Section 1387, the people shall be permitted one additional opportunity to refile charges where either of the prior dismissals under Section 1387 [was] due solely to excusable neglect. In no case shall the additional refiling of charges provided under this section be permitted where the conduct of the prosecution amounted to bad faith. “(b) As used in this section, ‘excusable neglect’ includes, but is not limited to, error on the part of the court, prosecution, law enforcement agency, or witnesses.” (Italics added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.