Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 COLOAPP 461 - Cone v. Jackson

Cone v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2007

4 state decisions

20189919001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Town of Trinidad v. Simpson · Hamill v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Motions of this character [to dismiss for want of prosecution] are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and, unless it manifestly appears that there has been an abuse of discretion, or that it has been arbitrarily exercised, this court cannot interfere.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.