Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 F.1d 108 - Gillette v. Bate Refrigerating Co.

Gillette v. Bate Refrigerating Co.’s Empirical Analysis

12 F. 108 · 1882

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
October 1913
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1913

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

201882189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Page v. Holmes Burglar Alarm Telegraph Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The present application, if maintainable at all, should properly, in its prayer, be for leave to file a supplemental bill, to bring forward the new evidence, and for a rehearing of the cause at the time when the supplemental bill should also be ready for a hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.