Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 F.2d 1018

Docket No. 388.

Rubsamen v. Schultz

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1926.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1926-06-01

3 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1926-06-01

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Appeal from an order of sale entered in a cause in equity in the District Cburt for the Southern District of New York.

¶3Ward V. Tobert (David Steekler, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

¶4Michael M. Helfgott, of New York City, for intervener appellee.

¶5Joseph D. Fackenthal, of New York City, for purchaser at sale.

¶6Before ROGERS, HOUGH and HAND, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8Ordered that, except as to the proceeds of the sales of real estate situated without the Southern district of New York, the decree be affirmed. The method of *1019modifying the decree in accordance with this direction is left to the lower court. No costs of this court are allowed.

/12/f2d/1018 · .json · Public domain