Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 F.2d 382 - Walker v. Traylor Engineering & Mfg. Co.

Walker v. Traylor Engineering & Mfg. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

12 F.2d 382 · 1926

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 1934
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Wirt Adams · Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co. · Gillespie v. . Torrance · Withers v. Greene · Brown v. Weldon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Plaintiffs in error plead that their indorsement was not made contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of the note, but that, after such execution and delivery by the cement company, plaintiffs in error, at the request of defendant in error, wrote their names across the back of the note; that their indorsements were therefore without consideration. This, if true, would constitute a good defense against a payee, not a holder in due-course, and defendant in error, being the original payee, is not a holder in due course.” 12 F.(2d) 385 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.