In re Barnett’s Empirical Analysis
12 F.2d 73 · 1926
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2000 · most notably Oldden v. Tonto Realty Corp. (1944), Litton Industries Credit Corp. v. Catanuto (1978)
13 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · The United States v. Jonah Crosby · Brine v. Insurance Co. · De Vaughn v. Hutchinson · Henry Clarke v. Nancy B Clarke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““thereby consents to the jurisdiction of the court to decide any defenses that may be lawfully interposed.” In re Barnett, 2 Cir., 1926, 12 F.2d 73, 81 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.