United States v. Cruz-Santiago’s Empirical Analysis
12 F.3d 1 · 1993
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2018
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1707 · 18 U.S.C. § 661
Relies on Brown v. Ohio · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Mayers v. United States · Mitan v. United States · Arizona v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“entered a bank, took $6,160, shot the assistant manager, ran outside the bank, saw a [vehicle] . . . passing by, forced its innocent driver out of the car, and drove off to a rendezvous point.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[v]aluation of loss is discussed in the Commentary to § 2B1.1 (Larceny, Embezzlement, and Other Forms of Theft).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“counted, as a robbery-related 'loss' for sentencing purposes, the value of a car . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.