Richardson v. Oldham’s Empirical Analysis
12 F.3d 1373 · 1994
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Peterson v. City of Fort Worth (2009), Mangieri v. Clifton (1994)
27 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · City of Canton v. Harris · Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“based on information and belief... [are] struck as not based on personal knowledge and therefore fail[] the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In the Matter of Carl A. Dengel, Debtor. R. Michael Bolen, United States Trustee, Region 5 v. Carl A. Dengel, Carl A. Dengel v. Bank One, National Association, Successor by Name Change to Bank One, Louisiana, National Association & Successor by Merger & Name Change to First National Bank of Commerce · Dengel v. A a“Credibility determinations have no place in summary judgment proceedings”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“non-movants' summary judgment evidence must be taken as true.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.