Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 F.3d 145 - Wilson v. Kemna

Wilson v. Kemna’s Empirical Analysis

12 F.3d 145 · 1994

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Frady · Scherl v. Fisher · Spillers v. Al Lockhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “alleges sufficient grounds for release, relevant facts are in dispute, and the state courts did not hold a full and fair evidentiary hearing.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he petitioner is not entitled to a hearing where the record clearly indicates that his claims are either barred from review or without merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.