Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 F.3d 1558 - McCabe v. Ce Sharrett

McCabe v. Ce Sharrett’s Empirical Analysis

12 F.3d 1558 · 1994

Citation profile

207
cited by 207 later decisions
5
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

80 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 207 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Holifield v. Reno (1997), Angie Chesser v. Amos Sparks (2001)

80 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

9001994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Perry v. Sindermann · Connick v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 207 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “adverse employment action for exercising the right.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “While it is clear that an employer's purely subjective fear of disruption is insufficient to outweigh an employee's exercise of her rights, it is also plain that Chief Sharrett's concern that McCabe's marriage would undermine her loyalty to him and thus the confidentiality of his office was reasonable and not merely subjective.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “right to associate for the purpose of engaging in those activities protected by the First Amendment--speech, assembly, petition for the redress of grievances, and the exercise of religion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.