Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 F.3d 204

Docket No. 93-7021.

Dingle v. Edmond C

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 25, 1993. Decided Nov. 19, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-11-19

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Webb F. Henderson, Jr. Joyce W. Henderson v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-11-19

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham, No. CA-93-220; Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge.

Randy Dingle, pro se.

William McBlief, North Carolina Dept. of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for defendants-appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Dingle v. Edmond, No. CA-93-220 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)

/12/f3d/204 · .json · Public domain