Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 F.3d 245 - Ryan v. Bentsen

Ryan v. Bentsen’s Empirical Analysis

12 F.3d 245 · 1993

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 12 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Wilbur v. Central Intelligence Agency (2004), Hidalgo v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2003)

12 federal appellate · 12 district ·

140199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Weinberger v. Salfi · Heckler v. Ringer · Mathews v. Diaz · Bowen v. City of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Exhaustion is generally required as a matter of preventing premature interference with agency processes, so that the agency may function efficiently and so that it may have an opportunity to correct its own errors, to afford the parties and the courts the benefit of its experience and expertise, and to compile a record which is adequate for judicial review.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “come before the court in a posture that facilitates review on the merits,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.