Democratic Central Committee of District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission Dc’s Empirical Analysis
12 F.3d 269 · 1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2023
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hirschey v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · Allen v. United States Steel Corp. · Swedish Hospital Corp. v. Shalala · Jones v. Armstrong Cork Co. · Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Attorneys were required] (1) to obtain a $4,976,124.79 judgment for unpaid restitution; (2) to institute two foreclosure proceedings ... (3) to institute attachment (garnishment) proceedings ... (4) to employ expert counsel in an attempt to enhance the value of [property]; and (5) to institute a broadly based fraud claim against [defendants] ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Notwithstanding that the Compromise Agreement never closed we apply the same standards for the payment of expenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.