Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 F.3d 301 - United States v. Tavano

United States v. Tavano’s Empirical Analysis

12 F.3d 301 · 1993

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
September 2023
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably United States v. Gifford (1994), Dopp v. Pritzker (1994)

47 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3001993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Bifulco v. United States · Penn v. Parke State Bank · Johnson v. Brown · United States v. Ruiz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] court must take pains to base sentencing judgments upon reliable and accurate information.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As a general rule, a trial court lawfully may make implicit findings with regard to sentencing matters, incorporating by reference suitably detailed suggestions limned in the PSI Report or advanced by a party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[D]ue process demands that a sentencing court 'consider all the available evidence, including conflicting evidence' to 'assure itself that a piece of proof is sufficiently reliable.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.