Arthur v. Manch’s Empirical Analysis
12 F.3d 377 · 1993
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp. · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roberts · Federal Election Commission v. National Conservative Political Action Committee · Chateaugay Corporation Ltv Official Committee of Unsecureds of Ltv Aerospace and Defense Co Inc v. Official Committee of Unsecureds of Ltv Steel Co Inc Ltv Ltv · George Arthur v. Ewald P. Nyquist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he injunction no longer controls the future activities of the parties and the consequences of the ... [order] cannot be undone”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Haley v. Pataki“review of the order at this time would serve no purpose”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Haley v. Pataki
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.