United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
12 F.3d 452 · 1994
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States v. Wells (1997), United States v. Rigas (2007)
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 664 (Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act)
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg · Henderson v. United States · Delaware v. New York · Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A false statement is material if it is shown to be capable of influencing a decision of the institution to which it was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the statements must be analyzed in the particular context in which they were made”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.