United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
12 F.3d 827 · 1994
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably United States v. Bieri (1994), United States v. Ryan (1994)
58 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Olano · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Atkinson · United Families of America v. Kendrick · Lane v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'affected his substantial rights, which requires a showing that the error was prejudicial and affected the trial's outcome.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e will reverse only if no reasonable jury could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that [the defendant] was guilty of the charged offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the weapon be present and available, in the house in which the drugs and cash are located, in the event it is needed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.