Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 F.3d 946 - Hubbard v. Shalala

Hubbard v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

12 F.3d 946 · 1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2013

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Pierce v. Underwood · Ramos v. Lamm · Rodriquez v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment, and the Commissioner of Social Security may, notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(i) of this title, certify the amount of such fee for payment to such attorney out of, and not in addition to, the amount of such past-due benefits. In case of any such judgment, no other fee may be payable or certified for payment for such representation except as provided in this paragraph.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.