Curtis v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
12 F.3d 97 · 1993
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2016
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Shalala v. Schaefer · Melkonyan v. Sullivan · Sullivan v. Hudson · Sullivan v. Finkelstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 100. 25 Mr. Raines contends, however, that the district court's remand order of June 8, 1990, was not a final judgment because the court did not comply with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the minute order form accompanying the magistrate judge's order, the box marked”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Raines v. Shalala“post-remand proceedings are completed ...[,] the Secretary returns to Court with a new decision” under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g)). . The same reasoning fully rebuts the majority's following tautology:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cleary v. Brown“the proceedings on remand cannot be considered as part of the 'civil action' in the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Raines v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.