Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 F. App'x 127

Redd v. United States

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 18, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-04-18

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2001-04-18

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Derrick Vincent Redd seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Redd, Nos. CR-97-6; CA-00-642 (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 12, 2000, entered Oct. 13, 2000; Nov. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/12/fappx/127 · .json · Public domain