¶1 David Henry Miller appeals the district court’s order denymg relief on Ms 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opiMon and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Hunt, No. CA-00-810-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented m the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 DISMISSED.