Travis v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2014
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2721 (§ 300002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 2725 (§ 300002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Whalen v. Roe · Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc. · National League of Cities v. Usery · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority · New York v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To state the obvious, the [DPPA] is not a law of general applicability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Condon v. Reno
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.