Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Ga. 155 - Wright v. Hicks

Wright v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1852

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
16
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably McNamara v. McNamara (1919), In Re Estate of Walker (1917)

1 federal appellate · 54 state decisions — followed in 16 states

80185218601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schauber v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he presumption in favor of legitimacy, still holds, whenever it is not inconsistent with the facts of the case; . . .Yet, if such circumstances be in proof as clearly negative the truth of this presumption, the legal intendment will fail, and no general rule of evidence, of universal application, can be prescribed upon this subject. In every case, the fact must be determined by the particular circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In the absence of anything in the will to the contrary, the presumption is that the ancestor intended that his property should go where the law carries it, which is supposed to be the channel of natural descent. To interrupt or disturb this descent, or direct it in a different course, should require plain words to that effect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the relative situation of the parties. their habits of life, the evidence of conduct and of declarations connected with conduct, and .... any induction which reason suggests, for determining upon the probabilities of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.